jump to navigation

Mental Entropy April 4, 2008

Posted by Cendri in Meta.
add a comment

Not too long ago I read a very interesting book called Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience which basically brought interesting study-based insights into how I operate. Well, how a lot of people do, but I had always wondered why simply sitting and channel-surfing always left me feeling tired and other such passive activities. While reading, something else considered somewhat passive, always left me energized.

Turns out my finicky behavior in regards to my things naturally stems from finicky behavior in regards to my mental state. That is, I really don’t deal well with mental entropy.

Since it’s approaching the end of my semester and thus doom, I have found myself in a state of mental entropy more than I’d like to be in, to great detriment. Especially considering I have one class that relies on memorization heavily, something which I’ve never been good at. I find myself noticing that I’m “spacing out more” and generally having to write things down to remind myself to write things down.

All in all, it’s been an unpleasant week, to say the least.

The biggest problem with entropy is when you notice it, it only gets worse and breeds more entropy. As much as anyone would like to say that they have things under control–they don’t. At best we just have a good response to the chaos around us, little ways to assert a small bit of control over certain areas. Which is likely to turn all philosophical and next thing you know, you’re pulling out some Cartesian Doubt and you sound like a looney.

So far the only thing I’ve found that can soothe states of mental entropy is that, when I have the time, I sit and focus on one very menial task. Like dusting. Or sewing a button onto something. It’s only a temporary fix, but it sure helps me to remember that I am not simply a toy of wicked evil Fates or something.

Funny how a lot of the things stated in the Flow book are related to a lot of Eastern philosophy, only with different goals. Flow is based on achieving a form of control, while a lot of Eastern thought is about losing it.

Maybe it’s time to switch tactics and give into the universe a little? Naw.

My Desk Is A Mess March 26, 2008

Posted by J in Productivity.
add a comment

We’re coming up on a big deadline at work, and I’ve noticed that the closer we are to panic time, the more of a mess my desk seems to be. And yes, as a consequence, I tend to spend more time hunting for files than I should.

Of course, there seems to come a point on every project where putting things away and taking them out again is more annoying than leaving them on the desk is, but this isn’t just about access. This is mostly about me being too tired to want to put them away at the end of my work day.

Yes, I know, lazy.

The problem is that I am a visual cues kind of person. When I need to do something unusual with a file, I leave it somewhere I’ll see it, which will remind me to do it when I have some free time (unless, of course, I’m working on a blog post). The problem is that files tend to pile up, and then my brain starts blocking them out and I don’t take care of any of them.

Oops.

The obvious solution is to stop being lazy and also to use a to-do list instead of visual cues. I’ve switched to a Remember the Milk-based system in my personal and school life, but to-dos seem to come so fast during the day that I can’t make myself use the website. I’m going to try both paper and Outlook-based lists (don’t laugh; Outlook is required by the office) and see which works better. If anything works, I’ll keep you updated.

Seasonal Purgery March 19, 2008

Posted by Cendri in Decluttering, Storage.
add a comment

I’ve always been a Spring Cleaner.

Partly due to the fact that winter is so much more pronounced where I live, but mostly due to the fact that I’ve never been good at cleaning regularly. This year I managed not to have the cluttered nesting problem so much, but then, I didn’t bring as much stuff to my dorm room as I had some years.

Doesn’t mean I don’t still have a lot of work to do.

My problem areas are my storage places. I come from a long line of severe hoarders, so it takes a lot of focus for me to throw things away. I’ve narrowed down specifically “nostalgia” items to a shoebox. Whoo!

I usually start with my clothes, because they have the biggest tendency to pile up. Relatives have a tendency of getting me things that are too huge (my mom especially) which I just shove in the back of my closet so as not to offend them. Then I get to the items I had hid away from Christmas that were, well, awful.

Honestly, who hasn’t gotten some horrible knick-knack given to them “out of love”?

I always leave papers and drawers for last, because a lot of that contains “useful” items. And I have the hardest time deciding whether or not to let something go. I’m big on recycling and reusing, so I rarely actually throw anything in the trash. In the recycle or donation bins? All the time. But I know I won’t reuse everything and have to at least get it out of my room.

But there’s another purpose to the Spring Cleaning other than controlling the amount of crap that builds up despite best intentions. And it’s for introspection. I read somewhere that you can tell more about a person by looking at their rooms than by asking their friends about them–and who better to know the significance of something than yourself? Likely you’re going to be the only one that will see why you kept that certain ticket stub or that cigar case.

Habits and hoarding and possessions are all a part of a person’s psychological makeup. But every now and then we could use a little dusting in our minds.

For instance, the first thing I did after a particularly traumatic year was purge. Got things associated with those memories out of my sight. Cleaned the smells out of the clothes, threw out the more potent reminders. Then I opened up a bunch of boxes I had put in storage from way before, got a glimpse at myself before I got all mixed up.

I guess what I’m advocating is keeping a box, at least. Something out of sight until you go and clean everything. You may find yourself throwing some things away, but at least they’re there for a little while. And others can get tucked back in until the next big purge.

It’s just a matter of keeping it from getting out of hand, is all. And actually throwing something away.

Containing my Excitement March 17, 2008

Posted by J in Meta, Storage.
Tags: ,
1 comment so far

I don’t ask for much. Some brightly-colored post-its. Some index cards. Maybe a few highlighters. My closet shelf is neatly stacked with magazine holders and storage boxes.

But sometimes I dream of more. I imagine that there’s a complete organization system out there that will finally allow me to find anything I need in my room without any effort on my part. Most of the time, I know it doesn’t exist, but sometimes I dream.

And sometimes reality encourages me: The Container Store is opening a branch in my metro area this year.

Part of me is tempted to look at that and say “oh, there’s no point in worrying about it until the Container Store opens and I can buy the perfect art or paper storage box, but that’s a cop-out. My collage paper fits perfectly fine in an oversized shoebox, I just need to remember to put it away when I’m done working.

The art of getting and staying organized has very little to do with my choice of boxes – though I like the ones I’ve chosen. It’s about actually sorting things. Going to the effort of putting things away. Throwing out things I don’t need. Making the effort is more important than buying the boxes.

Though come the grand opening, you’ll probably find me out there buying the boxes anyway.

Studying Smarter Means More Color March 7, 2008

Posted by Cendri in Productivity.
1 comment so far

I am a bad bad student.

Maybe it was all those years of being able to get by on the fact I am a world class guesser, but it made me very lazy about studying and otherwise being able to discipline myself in regards to schooling. While some people can still get away with this, I hit a sort of brick wall the instant I got to college and classes that required a little more than my diverse, but limited, general knowledge.

I have finally found a fantastic method for myself that allows me to actually retain information. And all I needed was to start using the highlighters and colored tabs I had collecting dust in a drawer.

This worked best for my history class, which is the type of class that really can’t be taught by anything other than lectures and reading. The main problem with this type of class is a lot of information goes in, but a lot of it needs to be filtered. In a way, I had to learn how to declutter the information I was receiving. Since I am not super disciplined, I had to do this twofold. So here was the first set of filters.

  1. Write notes in outline format (I type my notes, simply because I type faster than write)
  2. Keep notes in separate text files by date
  3. Only do the readings in segments related to their assignment
  4. Add a colored tag of the same color at the beginning of each segment

The third point was especially important, since I’m a fast reader and everything tends to jumble together if I don’t watch it. The fourth point is really only beneficial in that I used one color of a tag for every segment pertaining to a single test. That way when I needed to know which material was going to be on the next test, I could easily flip to it.

After sorting things as they came in, I was left with the processing part, otherwise known as studying. Most people will tell you that you need to study as you go, sometimes going to the extreme that you need to be reading something from a class every day. Personally, I find this tiring, and as some things have different deadlines, I fall behind that kind of schedule quickly.

So, I start about a week before an exam processing through all the information. I count listening in class and keeping up with the reading assignments as an initial pass through, and the actual studying as something far more in depth. But even this had a sort of process to it.

  1. Put all note files into one file and print it off (since I put the date at the top of all of them, this wasn’t disorganized)
  2. Go through notes and highlight all important names in one color
  3. Repeat this with locations, concepts, dates, each in their own separate color
  4. Then actually read through the notes
  5. Do this with reading materials, only more liberally

The first point is a necessity for me, because computers distract me easily when I need to focus. Can’t check email if there’s no email on a paper. For the most part, studying should be as low tech as possible. Points two and three were especially useful in that it helped distinguish certain important things; names didn’t get mixed up with locations, dates stood out, etc. For instance, I used a purple highlighter to indicate locations. When I got to point four, actually reading through it, the idea of locations being associated with purple stuck in my brain. Turning to the reading, I skimmed more, because it was less of an emphasis in the class. Not only that, the readings are always more dense than notes. So, only the first time a name appeared, unless it was connected with say, an invention in that paragraph was highlighted.

Using different colors also helped it from turning into the wall of yellow that is a mistake a lot of younger students I see make. Like the girl next to me in class, who used the same orange highlighter for everything.  The point about a good study method is to filter out the noise and try to filter to the types of facts you’ll be tested on. Because no matter how much they will tell you that you need to know everything in a class, they can’t possibly test you on all that. If you pay enough attention during class or when people ask questions before the exam, you will notice which things the professor finds important.

So go ahead and splurge for multiple colored highlighters and those neat flag thingies. Just make sure you use them appropriately.

Feed Me, Seymour February 22, 2008

Posted by J in Decluttering, Meta.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Leo at Zen Habits has a post on dropping RSS feeds. He discusses how he cut his 100 or so RSS feeds (which he spent an hour a day reading) down to a more manageable sixteen. Quite a leap. In his article, he outlines a ruthless system for minimizing the time spent on feeds every day.

For him, that may have been a necessary leap. But the article suggested readers take a look at their own feeds, so I did just that. According to Google Reader, I followed 175 feeds when I finished reading this article. Of those, maybe fifty update daily or more than daily. Maybe another twenty update on a regular schedule, two or three times a week. The rest are weekly or even less frequent.

One of his suggestions is to cut infrequent blogs. This was a bit of advice that I personally am going to put aside. To me, infrequent blogs are content that I enjoy that don’t take much of my time precisely because they rarely make demands on it – and yet, unlike an infrequently updated website, I don’t have to remember to come back to them and look for new content.

In the comments of the post, Leo mentions that part of the value for him in reducing his feeds is the sheer joy he feels from looking at a list that he’s whittled down that much. I suppose I can see how someone might feel that kind of joy, but I think that’s the difference between me and someone who’s a genuine productivity porn enthusiast – I find the techniques interesting, but I derive no inherent joy from having less of something. Less work, less worry, those are benefits of organization for me. Just plain less, or fewer enjoyable things, doesn’t have the same appeal.

I think that sort of near-fetishization in organization or productivity is a distant cousin of the “attachment to non-attachment” that sometimes crops up in enthusiastic Buddhists (and the related truism that new converts to almost any religion are often among the loudest and most obnoxious adherents). There’s a Buddhist tale about a monk who came to a river and needed to cross it, but there was no crossing for many miles. He built a raft out of the materials around him, and made his way across the river. When he got to the other side he left the raft there. He didn’t forget that the raft was a tool to get him over a specific hurdle.

So I’m keeping my infrequent feeds, and my comic strips, and my friends, and basically all the feeds I enjoy reading. I did remove a handful that I realized I was mostly skipping over… ironically, mostly productivity blogs or blogs about blogging. If you find you have more feeds than you have time to read them, you might also find his article helpful.

5 Ways to Manage Digital Packrattery February 22, 2008

Posted by J in Storage, Technology.
Tags: ,
add a comment

I am a digital packrat. I admitted this last night on the new forums for one of my favorite productivity sites, Zen Habits, and it made me think about how I think about keeping and storing information.

Inspired by that, I’d like to present my five ways to manage information for digital packrats.

  1. Put it all in one place – and I don’t just mean stacking a whole bunch of burned CDs on a spindle or in a CD album. If the files you have stored aren’t easily accessible, you might as well not have them because you’ll never bother to use them. If the list of files you think you need stored is less than a few gigabytes, I’d suggest backing them up to either a USB drive or a spare gmail account.
  2. A USB drive is a wonderful way to carry your research and projects with you, particularly if you use software like PortableApps to carry the software you need as well. However, USB drives are also easy to misplace – make sure that any sensitive data you have on one is encrypted with TrueCrypt or LockNote and include information for someone who finds the drive to get it back to you.
  3. Gmail storage is particularly useful if you have a lot of files that are difficult to browse on your computer or that you don’t need often, but need to keep. I set up an email address specifically for archiving. Every time I finish a project for a client, all the relevant files are zipped and sent along as an attachment with a useful label like “Client.com Website Archive” and any keywords I think I’ll use to find it later are typed in the body of the email. Old stories and poems, journal archives, and even archived versions of websites are stored here and accessible to me via google search. I can also backup my WordPress website and have it automatically sent to my archive email.
  4. If you’re the sort of person who keeps their entire media library on their computer, I’d suggest having an external hard drive dedicated solely to media. It’s certainly more convenient to have only one small box to take the place of all your CDs and DVDs – just make sure nothing happens to that hard drive, since one accidental disconnect could trash it.
  5. Finally, the easiest way to manage digital packrattery is not to be a packrat. I know it seems silly to worry about it when so much storage is so easy to have on hand, but like any clutter, the sheer volume of information can make it hard to remember what you have and where you have it. If you have a good organization system, this can be mitigated, but every system will break down eventually.

Besides, do you really need to keep those old hacker text files or the emails from your first internet crush, the one you haven’t talked to since since he stalked you in 2001? Somehow I think you wouldn’t really miss them if they were gone. I don’t.

You may also want to check out Geek to Live: Carry Your Life on a Thumb Drive

Bookworms and Bookshelves February 22, 2008

Posted by J in Decluttering.
Tags:
add a comment

There’s nothing that starts a debate on an organization or simplification forum like the topic of books. Some people think books are stuff like any other stuff, and you have to view your books the same way you view your clothes and your knick knacks. Most people, however, seem to view books as somehow sacrosanct and exempt from our self-imposed challenges and our mental definition of clutter. While my books are some of my favorite possessions, they’re still just possessions. (And very heavy possessions, as anybody who’s moved two dozen boxes of books through their college years can tell you.)

I’m going to say something that many booklovers would view as heresy: Odds are, you don’t need all those books. You probably don’t even really want all those books. Far better, then to cull your collection. (And hey, if you use all that space as an excuse to buy more books, that’s your own business.)

First, ask yourself, why do you have these books? Are they books you’re going to read, someday, really? Do your bookshelves act as a chronicle of your reading habits since you learned to sound out letters?

There’s nothing wrong with keeping the old favorites that you reread once a year, or even a few books you’ve had since you were small and you have a sentimental attachment to, but even if you think you can’t bear to part with any of them, you can still think about it. Yes, I’m giving you official permission to think about which books you would be willing to part with and why. If it makes it easier for you, tell yourself that you’re not really getting rid of any of them. You’re just doing a thought exercise.

Another thing that makes it easier for me to part with books is to make sure they’re going to good homes. Like pets and children, the image of a book left alone and forlorn in the rain makes me rush out to dry it off and give it a good home. I twitch at the idea of throwing a book away. But taking it to a used bookstore with an upscale and offbeat clientele that I know will appreciate it, or even giving it to a friend who would enjoy it, makes it possible for me to part with the book with a minimum of guilt.

Further Reading

Variations on the Four Box Method February 22, 2008

Posted by J in Decluttering.
Tags: ,
add a comment

One of the standard techniques for cleaning or decluttering in a problem room is the four box method. Used on scales as small as an overstuffed desk and as large as the homes that are featured on TLC’s Clean Sweep, the four box method is one of the most recommended ways to clean.

Some of that popularity can be ascribed to the simplicity of the technique. All you need to use the four box method is, as you may have guessed, four boxes. Each box gets a label: “put away,” “give away,” “throw away,” and “not sure.” Everything in the room then gets sorted into one of those four boxes. When you’re done, you put away the things in the put away box, toss the throw away box into the trash bin, drive the give away box to your local Goodwill, and put the not sure box somewhere out of the way. After a month or two, anything you haven’t found yourself needing from the not sure box goes to the Goodwill too.

The standard four box method works great in a variety of situations, but sometimes you’ll be in a situation where you need to add another box. For example, if there’s a good used bookstore in your area and you’re cleaning out a room with a lot of books, you may want a “sell” box next to the “give away” box. There are certain kinds of books no used bookstore will take off your hands, so there’s no point putting all the books in the “sell” box, but putting them in the give away box gets them out of sight and out of mind before you have a chance to feel guilty about parting with your beloved pages.

Similarly, someone cleaning out a particularly difficult closet might want to augment their “give away” box with a “sell” box for the sorts of gently-used designer clothes that you might want to trade in at your local Plato’s Closet or other upscale used clothes shop. The whole point of the four box method is to get everything sorted in one go, after all — using a sorting method that will require you to go through them again later defeats the purpose.

During my recent experience moving, my roommate and I hit on yet another variation on the four box method uniquely suited to moving. Replacing the “put away” box with a stack of boxes for packing helped us do double-duty, packing and decluttering at the same time.

It’s easy to look up an organizing system, try it, and realize it doesn’t suit your needs, but that doesn’t mean the system itself is useless. Most of these systems are popular because they’re universal enough to appeal to a lot of people. Take a second look and you may see that the system would be perfect for your job with just a little tweaking.

The Search for the Perfect Neurotic Backups February 22, 2008

Posted by J in Technology.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

My laptop died in January.

It was a long time coming, and I didn’t lose anything – the problem wasn’t the hard drive, and eventually I’ll probably take the time to crack that sucker open and put ‘er into an external drive case and retrieve my files.

In the meantime, I’ve been thinking about backups, offsite storage, and all the other assorted messy details of keeping files safe. Offsite backups are important in case the worst happens, after all, and also protect you from lesser evils like the day your cat manages to take out both your laptop and your external hard drive in one hunting expedition.

The problem with offsite backups for me has always been remembering to do them. I think I may have found a solution.

Amazon’s S3 offsite backup service is one of the cheapest around. To simplify its use and automate the backup of certain files, there’s JungleDisk, a $20 program that is written specifically to interface with Amazon’s storage and make it easier.

I’m still in the trial period for JungleDisk, so I’ll check back later and let you know what I decided to do with it.